Spatial Assessment of Accessibility to Public Healthcare Services: A Case Study on Accessibility to Hospitals in Shiraz

Document Type : Articles

Authors

goli@shirazu.ac.ir

Abstract

Introduction: Unfair distribution of healthcare services is one of the most important issues all over the world. The present study aimed to determine the distribution pattern of available hospital beds and the accessibility pattern to hospitals in Shiraz.Methods: This was an analytical study. At first, spatial distribution pattern of available hospital beds was determined using Moran’s Index (Moran’s I). Then, the accessibility pattern to hospitals was determined using Euclidean distance and network travel distance metrics. Allof the analyses were conducted using Arc GIS (10.3) software.Results: The results revealed that available hospital beds had a random and unbalanced distribution pattern in Shiraz based on Moran’s I (Moran’s I=-0.05). Besides, according the achieved standard service areas for the existing hospitals, calculated by using Network analysis tools, 65.47% of Shiraz population was underserved in terms of accessibility. Furthermore, assessment of accessibility patterns resulted from both types of applied distances, indicating that in most cases hospitals were located in the central parts of the city.Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, distribution of hospitals in Shiraz was unfair. Therefore, policymakers are suggested to plan in order to increase the number of Shiraz hospitals. They are also recommended that they should give priority to establishing new hospitals in areas without standard accessibility over areas with standard accessibility based on the results of the present study.Keywords: Accessibility, Available bed, Hospital, Moran’s index, Network analysis, Spatial pattern

References

  1. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. Concepts and
  2. Principles for Tackling Social Inequities in
  3. Health: Levelling Up. København: WHO
  4. Regional Office for Europe; 2006.
  5. Culyer AJ, Wagstaff A. Equity and equality
  6. in health and health care. J Health Econ.
  7. ;12(4):431-57. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-10-37
  8. Brabyn L, Skelly C. Modeling population access
  9. to New Zealand public hospitals. International
  10. journal of health geographics. 2002;1(1):3.
  11. Brabyn L, Skelly C. Modeling population access
  12. to New Zealand public hospitals. International
  13. journal of health geographics. 2002;1(1):3.
  14. Love D, Lindquist P. The geographical accessibility
  15. of hospitals to the aged: a geographic information
  16. systems analysis within Illinois. Health Serv Res.
  17. ;29(6):629-51.
  18. Rice N, Smith PC. Ethics and geographical equity
  19. in health care. J Med Ethics. 2001;27(4):256-61.
  20. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.4.256.
  21. McLafferty SL. GIS and health care. Annu Rev
  22. Public Health. 2003;24:25-42. doi: 10.1146/
  23. annurev.publhealth.24.012902.141012
  24. Clark R, Coffee N. Why measuring accessibility
  25. is important for public health: a review from the
  26. Cardiac ARIA project. Public Health Bulletin of
  27. South Australia. 2011;8(1):3-8.
  28. Dever GA, Champagne F. Epidemiology in health
  29. services management: Jones & Bartlett Learning;
  30. Apparicio P, Abdelmajid M, Riva M, Shearmur R.
  31. Comparing alternative approaches to measuring
  32. the geographical accessibility of urban health
  33. services: Distance types and aggregation-error
  34. issues. International journal of health geographics.
  35. ;7:7. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-7-7
  36. Rosero-Bixby L. Spatial access to health care in
  37. Costa Rica and its equity: a GIS-based study. Soc
  38. Sci Med. 2004;58(7):1271-84. doi: 10.1016/S0277-
  39. (03)00322-8
  40. Kalogirou S, Mostratos N, editors. Geographical
  41. Acces to Health: modelling population access
  42. to Greek public hospitals. 7th Panhellenic
  43. Geografical Conference of the Hellenic
  44. Geographical Society Physical Geography and
  45. the Environment-Sustainable Development and
  46. Planning; 2004: HGS Mytilene, Greece.
  47. Pedigo AS, Odoi A. Investigation of disparities in
  48. geographic accessibility to emergency stroke and
  49. myocardial infarction care in East tennessee using
  50. geographic information systems and network
  51. analysis. Ann Epidemiol. 2010;20(12):924-30. doi:
  52. 1016/j.annepidem.2010.06.013
  53. Shahid R, Bertazzon S, Knudtson ML, Ghali
  54. WA. Comparison of distance measures in
  55. spatial analytical modeling for health service
  56. planning. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:200. doi:
  57. 1186/1472-6963-9-200
  58. Boscoe FP, Henry KA, Zdeb MS. A Nationwide
  59. Comparison of Driving Distance Versus Straight-
  60. Line Distance to Hospitals. The Professional
  61. geographer : the journal of the Association
  62. of American Geographers. 2012;64(2). doi:
  63. 1080/00330124.2011.583586
  64. Deza MM, Deza E. Encyclopedia of distances.
  65. Encyclopedia of Distances: Springer; 2009. p.
  66. -583.
  67. Comber A, Brunsdon C, Green E. Using a GISbased
  68. network analysis to determine urban
  69. greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and
  70. religious groups. Landscape and Urban Planning.
  71. ;86(1):103-14.
  72. Kumar P, Kumar D. Network analysis using
  73. GIS techniques: A case of Chandigarh city.
  74. International Journal of Science and Research.
  75. ;5(2):409-11.
  76. Moran PA. Notes on continuous stochastic
  77. phenomena. Biometrika. 1950;37(1-2):17-23. doi:
  78. 2307/2332142.
  79. Li H, Calder CA, Cressie N. Beyond Moran’s
  80. I: testing for spatial dependence based on the
  81. spatial autoregressive model. Geographical
  82. Analysis. 2007;39(4):357-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-
  83. 2007.00708.x
  84. Panigrahi N. Computing in geographic
  85. information systems. Florida: CRC Press; 2014.
  86. Maciejewski R. Data representations,
  87. transformations, and statistics for visual reasoning.
  88. Synthesis Lectures on Visualization. 2011;2(1):1-
  89. doi: 10.2200/s00357ed1v01y201105vis002.
  90. Nazaripour H, Dostkamiyan M, Alizadeh S.
  91. The spatial distribution patterns of temperature,
  92. precipitation, and humidity using geostatistical
  93. exploratory analysis (case study: Central Area
  94. of Iran). Journal of Earth and Space Physics.
  95. ;41(1):99-117. Persion.
  96. McKee M, Healy J. The role of the hospital in a
  97. changing environment. Bull World Health Organ.
  98. ;78(6):803-10.
  99. Rahimi F, Goli A, Rezaee R. Hospital locationallocation
  100. in Shiraz using Geographical
  101. Information System (GIS). Shiraz E Med J.
  102. ;18(8). doi: 10.5812/semj.57572.
  103. Mizen A, Fry R, Grinnell D, Rodgers SE.
  104. Quantifying the Error Associated with
  105. Alternative GIS-based Techniques to Measure
  106. Access to Health Care Services. AIMS
  107. public health. 2015;2(4):746-61. doi: 10.3934/
  108. publichealth.2015.4.746.
  109. Satcher D, Rust G. Achieving health equity in
  110. America. Ethn Dis. 2006;16(2 Suppl 3):S3-8-13.
  111. Beedasy J. Rural designations and geographic
  112. access to tertiary healthcare in Idaho. Online J
  113. Rural Res Policy. 2010;5(2):1. doi: 10.4148/ojrrp.
  114. v5i2.191.
  115. Kreng VB, Yang CT. The equality of resource
  116. allocation in health care under the National
  117. Health Insurance System in Taiwan. Health
  118. Policy. 2011;100(2-3):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.
  119. healthpol.2010.08.003.
  120. Kumar N. Changing geographic access to and
  121. locational efficiency of health services in two
  122. Indian districts between 1981 and 1996. Soc
  123. Sci Med. 2004;58(10):2045-67. doi: 10.1016/j.
  124. socscimed.2003.08.019.
  125. Balarajan Y, Selvaraj S, Subramanian SV. Health
  126. care and equity in India. Lancet. 2011;377(9764):505-
  127. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61894-6.
  128. Masseria C, Giannoni M. Equity in access to
  129. health care in Italy: a disease-based approach. Eur
  130. J Public Health. 2010;20(5):504-10. doi: 10.1093/
  131. eurpub/ckq029.
  132. Barraza-Llorens M, Bertozzi S, Gonzalez-Pier E,
  133. Gutierrez JP. Addressing inequity in health and
  134. health care in Mexico. Health Aff (Millwood).
  135. ;21(3):47-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.3.47.
  136. Gutierrez JP, Garcia-Saiso S, Dolci GF, Hernandez
  137. Avila M. Effective access to health care in
  138. Mexico. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:186. doi:
  139. 1186/1472-6963-14-186.
  140. Liu GG, Zhao Z, Cai R, Yamada T, Yamada T.
  141. Equity in health care access to: assessing the
  142. urban health insurance reform in China. Soc Sci
  143. Med. 2002;55(10):1779-94. doi: 10.1016/s0277-
  144. (01)00306-9.
  145. Liu W, Liu Y, Twum P, Li S. National equity of
  146. health resource allocation in China: data from
  147. to 2013. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:68. doi:
  148. 1186/s12939-016-0357-1.
Health Management & Information Science
Volume 5, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
31
July 2018
Pages 104-110

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics