The Associations of Family Cohesion and Impulsivity with High-Risk Behaviors in Female High School Students: The Mediating Role of Internet Addiction

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Psychology, Ahv.C., Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Risky behaviors among adolescents represent a significant global public health concern. This study examined the direct and indirect effects of family cohesion and impulsivity on risky behaviors in female high school students, focusing on the mediating role of internet addiction.
Methods: A cross-sectional correlational design with structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed. The sample consisted of 661 female high school students in Ahvaz, Iran (2024–2025 academic year), selected via multi-stage cluster sampling. Instruments included the Family Cohesion Scale (FCS), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), Young’s Internet Addiction Test (IAT), and the Iranian Adolescent Risk-Taking Scale (IARS). The mediation model was tested using path analysis.
Results: Family cohesion was significantly and negatively associated with risky behaviors (β = -0.23, P < 0.001), while impulsivity showed a significant positive association (β = 0.20, P < 0.001). Internet addiction partially mediated both relationships, with significant indirect effects for family cohesion (β=−0.05, 95% CI (−0.08, −0.03), P<0.001) and impulsivity (β=0.07, 95% CI (0.04, 0.10), P<0.001).
Conclusion: Lower family cohesion and higher impulsivity were associated with greater internet addiction, which in turn was associated with elevated risky behaviors among female adolescents. These cross-sectional findings are consistent with a statistical mediation model in which internet addiction partially mediates the associations between family cohesion/impulsivity and risky behaviors. Prevention and intervention efforts may benefit from targeting family bonds, impulsivity, and internet addiction to mitigate risky behaviors in this population.

Highlights

Seyedeh Fatemeh Mousavian: Google Scholar

Reza Johari Fard: Google Scholar

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Mastorci F, Lazzeri MF, Vassalle C, Pingitore A. The Transition from Childhood to Adolescence: Between Health and Vulnerability. Children. 2024;11(8):989. doi: 10.3390/children11080989.
  2. Larsen B, Luna B. Adolescence as a neurobiological critical period for the development of higher-order cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;94:179–95. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.005.
  3. Garrido EF, Weiler LM, Taussig HN. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Health-Risk Behaviors in Vulnerable Early Adolescents. J Early Adolesc. 2018;38(5):661–80. doi: 10.1177/0272431616687671.
  4. Aleebrahim F, Soleimani S, Tarrahi M J. The Correlation Between Self-Expression and High-Risk Behaviors in Students. Shiraz E-Med J. 2024;25(10):e140261. doi: 10.5812/semj-140261.
  5. Babicka-Wirkus A, Kozłowski P, Wirkus Ł, Stasiak K. Internalizing and Externalizing Disorder Levels among Adolescents: Data from Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(3). doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032752.
  6. Çiçek İ, Korkmaz Z, Ünsal F, Shalal Alanazi Z, Gómez-Salgado J, Yıldırım M. The effect of secure attachment on family relationships and peer bullying in adolescents: the mediating role of positive childhood experiences. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1700648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1700648.
  7. Jaggers JW, Church WT, Tomek S, Hooper LM, Bolland KA, Bolland JM. Adolescent Development as a Determinant of Family Cohesion: A Longitudinal Analysis of Adolescents in the Mobile Youth Survey. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2015;24(6):1625–37. doi: 10.1007/s10826-014-9966-8.
  8. Deng X, Lin M, Zhang L, Li X, Gao Q. Relations between family cohesion and adolescent-parent's neural synchrony in response to emotional stimulations. Behav Brain Funct. 2022;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12993-022-00197-1.
  9. van Eickels RL, Tsarpalis-Fragkoulidis A, Zemp M. Family cohesion, shame-proneness, expressive suppression, and adolescent mental health-A path model approach. Front Psychol. 2022;13:921250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.921250.
  10. Gong F, Lei Z, Gong Z, Min H, Ge P, Guo Y, et al. The Role of Family Health in Mediating the Association between Smartphone Use and Health Risk Behaviors among Chinese Adolescent Students: A National Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(20):13378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013378.
  11. Bakhshani NM. Impulsivity: a predisposition toward risky behaviors. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2014;3(2):e20428. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.20428.
  12. Moshagen M, Bader M, Zettler I, Hilbig BE. The role of impulse and interference control in aversive personality: A comprehensive assessment. Acta Psychologica. 2023;239:104018. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104018.
  13. Astolfi RC, Leite MA, Papa CHG, Ryngelblum M, Eisner M, Peres MFT. Association between self-control and health risk behaviors: a cross-sectional study with 9th grade adolescents in São Paulo. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1706. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11718-4.
  14. Chamorro J, Bernardi S, Potenza MN, Grant JE, Marsh R, Wang S, et al. Impulsivity in the general population: a national study. J Psychiatr Res. 2012;46(8):994–1001. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.04.023.
  15. Rodriguez-Nieto G, Emmerling F, Dewitte M, Sack AT, Schuhmann T. The Role of Inhibitory Control Mechanisms in the Regulation of Sexual Behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2019;48(2):481–94. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1283-7.
  16. Kuss DJ, Lopez-Fernandez O. Internet addiction and problematic Internet use: A systematic review of clinical research. World J Psychiatry. 2016;6(1):143–76. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v6.i1.143.
  17. Azhdari Z, Hooman F, Khabir L. Predicting Attitudes Toward Extramarital Relationships Based on Loneliness, Dependence on Online Social Media, and Mindfulness in Students. Health Management & Information Science. 2025;12(3):185–92. doi: 10.30476/jhmi.2025.106932.1282.
  18. Toozandehjani A, Mahmoodi Z, Rahimzadeh M, Jashni Motlagh A, Akbari Kamrani M, Esmaelzadeh Saeieh S. The predictor role of Internet addiction in high- risk behaviors and general health status among Alborz students: A structural equation model. Heliyon. 2021;7(5):e06987. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06987.
  19. Mousavi S, Shahsavari MR, Asarian F. The Relationship Between Aggression and Video Game Addiction in Students: The Mediating Role of Emotion Regulation Difficulty and Social Empathy. Health Management & Information Science. 2024;11(2):66–75. doi: 10.30476/jhmi.2024.103316.1229.
  20. Ana P, Teodora S, Elvis M, Ardea M, Aleksandar R, Zaklina R, et al. Factors Related to Internet Addiction in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2024;53(5). doi: 10.18502/ijph.v53i5.15592.
  21. Li S, Ren P, Chiu MM, Wang C, Lei H. The Relationship Between Self-Control and Internet Addiction Among Students: A Meta-Analysis. Front Psychol. 2021;12:735755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.735755.
  22. Bajorvand M, Eftekhar Saadi Z, Homaei R, Heidari A. Relationship between Academic Adjustment and Academic Stress in Students: Mediated by Smartphone Addiction. Health Management & Information Science. 2023;10(1):40–5. doi: 10.30476/jhmi.2023.98596.1177.
  23. Zadeh Mohammadi A, Ahmadabadi Z, Heidari M. Construction and Assessment of Psychometric Features of Iranian Adolescents Risk-Taking Scale. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2011;17(3):218-225.
  24. Amani A, Babaey Gharmkhani M. The Investigating of Relationship between Family Cohesion and Parental Discipline with Identity Crisis and Passionate Love to Opposite Sex in Teenage Boys. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2014;4(3):529-551.
  25. Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol. 1995;51(6):768–74. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::aid-jclp2270510607>3.0.co;2-1.
  26. Javid M, Mohammadi N, Rahimi C. Psychometric properties of an Iranian version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11). Psychological Models and Methods. 2012;2(8):23–34.
  27. Young KS. Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 1998;1(3):237–44. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237.
  28. Mohammadsalehi N, Mohammadbeigi A, Jadidi R, Anbari Z, Ghaderi E, Akbari M. Psychometric Properties of the Persian Language Version of Yang Internet Addiction Questionnaire: An Explanatory Factor Analysis. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2015;4(3):e21560. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.21560.
  29. Abdoli Kotiyani S, Homaei R, Jayervand H, Bavi S. Effectiveness of an Attachment-based Family Program on Emotional Awareness and Social Desirability in High School Students. Practice in Clinical Psychology. 2025;13(4):309. doi: 10.32598/jpcp.13.4.1035.2.
  30. Chiang C-J, Chen Y-C, Wei H-S, Jonson-Reid M. Social bonds and profiles of delinquency among adolescents: Differential effects by gender and age. Children and Youth Services Review. 2020;110:104751. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104751.
  31. Padilla-Walker LM, Carlo G, Memmott-Elison MK. Longitudinal Change in Adolescents' Prosocial Behavior Toward Strangers, Friends, and Family. J Res Adolesc. 2018;28(3):698–710. doi: 10.1111/jora.12362.
  32. Miklósi M, Kovács KE. The Interplay Between Juvenile Delinquency and ADHD: A Systematic Review of Social, Psychological, and Educational Aspects. Behav Sci (Basel). 2025;15(8). doi: 10.3390/bs15081044.
  33. Barati F, Pourshahbaz A, Nosratabadi M, Shiasy Y. Driving Behaviors in Iran: Comparison of Impulsivity, Attentional Bias, and Decision-Making Styles in Safe and High-Risk Drivers. Iran J Psychiatry. 2020;15(4):312–21. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v15i4.4297.
  34. Wang Y, Zhou K, Wang Y, Zhang J, Xie Y, Wang X, et al. Examining the association of family environment and children emotional/behavioral difficulties in the relationship between parental anxiety and internet addiction in youth. Front Psychiatry. 2024;15:1341556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1341556.
  35. Tunney C, Rooney B. Using Theoretical Models of Problematic Internet Use to Inform Psychological Formulation: A Systematic Scoping Review. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023;28(2):810–30. doi: 10.1177/13591045221104569.
  36. Qi W. Parental Conflict and Problematic Internet Use in Chinese Adolescents: Testing a Moderated Mediation Model of Adolescents' Effortful Control and Emotional Dysregulation. J Interpers Violence. 2021;36(13-14):Np6827–np43. doi: 10.1177/0886260518822342.
  37. Harsej Z, Mokhtari Lakeh N, Sheikholeslami F, KazemnezhadLeili E. Internet Addiction and Its Relationship with Family Functioning in High School Students. Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery. 2021;31(1):44. doi: 10.32598/jhnm.31.1.2025.
  38. Cho J, Kim H. The role of impulsivity and emotional dysregulation in smartphone overdependence explored through network analysis. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):1852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85680-1.