Awareness and Attitudes toward the Safety of Motorcyclists: A Training Approach, 2016

Document Type : Articles

Authors

Abstract

Introduction: Due to the high level of vulnerability, motorcyclists are considered a priorityfor research and intervention. Therefore, this study aimed to improve the society’s awareness and attitudes toward motorcycle traffic safety.Method: This study involved a randomized clinical trial conducted in 2016 among traumapatients and their caregivers in Shahid Rajaee hospital, Shiraz. Block randomization wasused to divided the patients into study and control groups. Data collection was done usinga researcher-made questionnaire called “Awareness & Attitude associated with MotorcycleTraffic Safety”; the questionnaire was found reliable with a Cronbach’s alpha of 78%. We made use of a pairwise T-test to make our intergroup comparisons; in cases of non-normal data, a non-parametric alternative was employed. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to study the inter-variable relationships.Results: Participants included 276 patients, 138 in each group. Generally, 72.7% of thepopulation consisted of males and the rest were females. The participants had a mean age of 31.38±10.46 years. Our pairwise T-test in the case group revealed a significant difference in attitudes and awareness of the subjects before and after the intervention (P<0.001). The oneway ANOVA indicated the influence of marital status on the level of awarenessafter training. Furthermore, training had the highest impact on the age-group of 47-62 years old.Conclusion: Training would lead to increased awareness and improved attitudes in societytoward motorcycle traffic safety, and would indirectly be an effective step toward improvement of traffic culture and reduction of road traffic accidents (RTA).Keywords: Accident prevention, Safety behavior, Motorcyclists

  1. Mohammadfam I, Golmohammadi R. Evaluation
  2. of safety behavior among coach drivers in Hamadan. 2004.
  3. Odero W, Khayesi M, Heda PM. Road traffic injuries in Kenya: magnitude, causes and status of intervention. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2003;10(12):53-61. doi: 10.1076/icsp.10.1.53.14103.
  4. Lin MR, Kraus JF. A review of risk factors and patterns of motorcycle injuries. Accid Anal Prev. 2009;41(4):710-22. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.03.010.
  5. Ranjan DP, Fahim M, Kirte RC. A cross sectional study to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice towards road traffic safety among adolescent students of a selected Pre-University
  6. college in Raichur city. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health. 2018;5(6):2446-52. doi: 10.18203/2394-6040. ijcmph20182175.
  7. Verma PK, Tiwari K, editors. Epidemiology of road traffic injuries in Delhi: Result of a survey. Regional Health Forum; 2004.
  8. Gordon H. Psychiatry, the law and death on the roads. Advances in Psychiatric treatment. 2004;10(6):439-45. doi: 10.1192/apt.10.6.439.
  9. McEvoy SP, Stevenson MR, Woodward M. Phone use and crashes while driving: A representative ,survey of drivers in two Australian states. Med J Aust. 2006;185(11-12):630-4.
  10. Coate D, Markowitz S. The effects of daylight and daylight saving time on US pedestrian fatalities and motor vehicle occupant fatalities. Accid Anal Prev. 2004;36(3):351-7. doi: 10.1016/S00014575(03)00015-0.
  11. Coben JH, Steiner CA, Miller TR. Characteristics of motorcycle-related hospitalizations: comparing states with different helmet laws. Accid Anal Prev. 2007;39(1):190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.06.018.
  12. Nakamura N, Yamaura A, Shigemori M, Ono J, Kawamata T, Sakamoto T, et al. Epidemiology, prevention and countermeasures against severe traumatic brain injury in Japan and
  13. abroad. Neurol Res. 2002;24(1):45-53. doi: 10.1179/016164102101199530.
  14. Servadei F, Begliomini C, Gardini E, Giustini M, Taggi F, Kraus J. Effect of Italy’s motorcycle helmet law on traumatic brain injuries. Inj Prev. 2003;9(3):257-60. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.3.257 .
  15. Nantulya VM, Reich MR. The neglected epidemic: road traffic injuries in developing countries. BMJ. 2002;324(7346):1139-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj. 324.7346.1139.
  16. Elder RW, Shults RA, Sleet DA, Nichols JL, Thompson RS, Rajab W, et al. Effectiveness of mass media campaigns for reducing drinking
  17. and driving and alcohol-involved crashes: a
  18. systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27(1): 5765.
  19. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.002.
  20. Ghasemzadeh S, Babazadeh T, Allahverdipour H, Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Kouzekanani K. Cognitive-behavioral determinants of using helmet by motorcyclists in a rural community. Journal of Transport & Health. 2017;6:548-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2017.04.007.
  21. Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78(1):98. doi: 10.1037//00219010.78.1.98.
  22. Martinussen LM. Facilitating improved road safety based on increased knowledge about driving behaviour and profiling sub-groups of drivers: Ph. D Thesis; 2013.
  23. Tajvar A, Yekaninejad MS, Aghamolaei T, Shahraki SH, Madani A, Omidi L. Knowledge, attitudes, and practice of drivers towards traffic regulations in Bandar-Abbas, Iran. Electronic physician. 2015;7(8):1566-74. doi: 10.19082/1566.
  24. Al-Zahrani AH. Knowledge and attitude toward road traffic regulations among students of Health Sciences College in Taif Region, KSA. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2015;4:241-4. doi: 10.5455/ ijmsph.2015.2810201447.
  25. JA, Gliem RR, editors. Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales2003: Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community ….
  26. Yonesian M, Moradi A. Knowledge, attitude and practice of drivers on regulation of traffic in Tehr an. J Sch Public Health Instit Public Health Res. 2005.
  27. Liu BC, Ivers R, Norton R, Boufous S, Blows S, Lo SK. Helmets for preventing injury in motorcycle riders. The Cochrane database of
  28. systematic reviews. 2008(1):CD004333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004333.pub3.
  29. Li LP, Li GL, Cai QE, Zhang AL, Lo SK. Improper motorcycle helmet use in provincial areas of a developing country. Accid Anal
  30. Prev. 2008;40(6):1937-42. doi: 10.1016/j. aap.2008.06.019.
  31. Musselwhite C, Avineri E, Susilo Y, Fulcher E, Bhattachary D, Hunter A. Understanding public attitudes to road user safety: final report. Road safety research report no. 111. 2010.
  32. Yahia HA, Ismail A, Albrka SI, Almselati AS, Ladin MA. Attitudes and awareness of traffic safety among drivers in Tripoli-Libya. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology.
  33. ;7(24):5297-303. doi: 10.19026/rjaset.7.929.
  34. Duperrex O, Bunn F, Roberts I. Safety education of pedestrians for injury prevention: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2002;324(7346):1129. doi: 10.1002/14651858. cd001531.
  35. Salvarani CP, Colli BO, Carlotti Junior CG. Impact of a program for the prevention of traffic accidents in a Southern Brazilian city: a model
  36. for implementation in a developing country. Surg Neurol. 2009;72(1):6-13; discussion -4. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.10.008.
  37. Observatoire National Interministeriel de Securite Routière [Internet]. Le permis à point en 2008. Retrieved June 13, 2009. Avilable from: http: //www2. securiteroutiere.gouv. fr/IMG/
  38. Synthese/EA PPOINT.pdf