Determinants of Physicians' Technology Acceptance for Mobile Health Services in Healthcare Settings

Document Type : Articles



 Introduction: World Health Organization reports indicated that the image of health care service delivery has changed by application of mobile health and wireless technologies for supporting and achieving the objectives of the health industry. The present study aimed to determine the level of physicians’ familiarity and investigate the factors affecting the acceptance of mobile health from the viewpoint of physicians working in educational hospitals of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences.Method: A cross-sectional study was carried out in Zahedan University of Medical Sciences in the southeast of Iran in 2016. The statistical population included all physicians working in five University Teaching Hospitals (n=150). In this study, systematic random sampling was used. A validated questionnaire, prepared based on the variables of Technology Acceptance Model 2 and models, was used for data collection. To analyze the data, we used descriptive and analytical statistics (Confirmatory Factor Analysis, linear and multiple regression).Results: Most of the respondents (112, or 74.4%) were female and 84 of them (56%) were less than 30 years old. All of the physicians (specialist and general physician) used Smartphones. The score of perceived usefulness, behavioral intention, perceived enjoyment, subjective norm, perceived ease of use, image, volunteering, and objective usability constructs were higher than the average baseline, representing the acceptance of mobile phone by them. The relationship of all the constructs with each other towards the attitudinal and behavioral objectives of the mobile health services acceptance was significant (P< 0.05). However, demonstrability construct had no correlation with perceived usefulness (P>0.05).Conclusion: The results of this study provide useful information to health managers and policymakers so that they can take steps to improve the quality of services using modern technologies. Plans can also be made by considering the factors as behavioral acceptance of mobile health and other effective factors to increase the willingness to use it.Keywords: Mobile Health, Physician, Acceptance 

  1. Kellermann AL, Jones SS. What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health information technology. Health affairs. 2013;32(1):63-8.
  2. Istepanian RS, Sungoor A, Earle KA, editors. Technical and compliance considerations for mobile health self-monitoring of glucose and blood pressure for patients with diabetes. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009, EMBC 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE; 2009: IEEE; 5130-5133.
  3. Aungst TD. Medical applications for pharmacists using mobile devices. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2013;47(7-8):1088-95.
  4. World Health Organization. m-Health–New horizons for health through mobile technologies, Global Observatory for e-Health series 2016. Available from:
  5. Measuring the information society: The ICT development index, (2009).
  6. Tran K, Morra D, Lo V, Quan SD, Abrams H, Wu RC. Medical students and personal smartphones in the clinical environment: the impact on confidentiality of personal health information and professionalism. Journal of medical Internet research. 2014;16(5):e132.
  7. Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N. The smartphone in medicine: a review of current and potential use among physicians and students. Journal of medical Internet research. 2012;14(5):e128.
  8. Nundy S, Dick JJ, Goddu AP, Hogan P, Lu C-YE, Solomon MC, et al. Using mobile health to support the chronic care model: developing an institutional initiative. International journal of telemedicine and applications. 2012;2012(18).
  9. Xi-tong G, Jin-qiao Y, Xiong-fei C, Xiao-dong C, editors. Understanding the acceptance of mobile health services: A service participants analysis. Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE), 2012 International Conference on; 2012: IEEE.
  10. Venkatesh V, Davis FD, Morris MG. Dead or alive? The development, trajectory and future of technology adoption research. Journal of the association for information systems. 2007;8(4):267-86.
  11. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science. 2000;46(2):186-204.
  12. Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information systems research. 1991;2(3):192-222.
  13. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science. 1989;35(8):982-1003.
  14. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research. 2000;11(4):342-65.
  15. Iivari J. An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success. ACM Sigmis Database. 2005;36(2):8-27.
  16. Abdekhoda M, Ahmadi M, Dehnad A, Noruzi A, Gohari M. Applying electronic medical records in health care: Physicians’ perspective. Applied clinical informatics. 2016;7(2):341-54.
  17. Azami M, Khajouei R, Rakhshani S. Postgraduate medical students’ acceptance and understanding of scientific information databases and electronic resources. Electronic physician. 2016;8(3):2066-72.
  18. Hsiao J-L, Chen R-F. Critical factors influencing physicians’ intention to use computerized clinical practice guidelines: an integrative model of activity theory and the technology acceptance model. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2016;16(1):3.
  19. Basak E, Gumussoy CA, Calisir F. Examining the factors affecting PDA acceptance among physicians: an extended technology acceptance model. Journal of healthcare engineering. 2015;6(3):399-418.
  20. Sharifzadeh G, Jahed Sarawani M, Khazaei T. The relationship between emotional intelligence and mobile dependency of students in Birjand Azad University, 2012. Modern Care Journal. 2014;10(4):279-87.
  21. Frühauf J, Schwantzer G, Ambros‐Rudolph CM, Weger W, Ahlgrimm‐Siess V, Salmhofer W, et al. Pilot study on the acceptance of mobile teledermatology for the home monitoring of high‐need patients with psoriasis. Australasian Journal of Dermatology. 2012;53(1):41-6.
  22. Zamani BE, Babri H, Mosavi S. The factors affecting students’ attitudes toward learning via cellular phone: a study on students of isfahan university of medical sciences using technology acceptance model. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2013;9(2):110-7.
  23. Yu P, Li H, Gagnon M-P. Health IT acceptance factors in long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional survey. International journal of medical informatics. 2009;78(4):219-29.
  24. Gharibi F, Mohammadi A, editors. [mobile learning and formal and informal training]. International conference on e-learning & teaching; 2009; Iran University of Science & Technology.
  25. Burton-Jones A, Hubona GS. The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Information & Management. 2006;43(6):706-17.
  26. Soleimani A, Zarafshani K. [Factors determining adoption information technology by vocational agricultural teachers using technology acceptance model (TAM) in Kermanshah province]. Iranian Research Institute Science and Technology. 2011;26(4):885-902.
  27. Khorasani A, Abdolmaleki J, Zahedi H. [Factors affecting E-Learning acceptance among students of tehran university of medical sciences based on technology acceptance model (TAM)]. Iranian journal of medical education. 2012;11(6):664-73.
  28. Mooghali A, Talebi S, Seif MH. [Contributing factors to the attitudes toward using informationand communication technology (ICT) among students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, School of Management]. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2011;8(1):33-40.
  29. Teo T, Lee CB, Chai CS, Wong SL. Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education. 2009;53(3):1000-9.
  30. Hung S-Y, Chang C-M, Kuo S-R. User acceptance of mobile e-government services: An empirical study. Government Information Quarterly. 2013;30(1):33-44.
  31. Bidmon S, Terlutter R, Röttl J. What explains usage of mobile physician-rating apps? Results from a web-based questionnaire. Journal of medical Internet research. 2014;16(6):e148.