Health Management & Information Science

Health Management & Information Science

The assessment of Picture Archiving and Communication System based on Canadian Infoway PACS Opinion Survey in Teaching Hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Document Type : Articles

Authors
Fatemeh Bahador
Roxana Sharifian
Atefeh Farmani
Abstract
Introduction: Today the use of information technology in accordance with the rapid environmental changes and flexibility acquisition is necessary and unavoidable. Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) is one of the medical information technology used in health facilities. PACS provides the images archive and transmission possibility electronically in different units of the teaching and treatment centers. This study aimed to assess the PACS system in teaching hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences based on a survey of Canadian Infoway.Method: This descriptive cross-sectional study was performed on 53 individuals selected through Two-Stage Stratified Random Sampling. The study population consisted of 156 PACS users in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences hospitals which were equipped with the PACS system in 2015. Data were collected by the valid and reliable customized questionnaire of Canadian Infoway. The reliability was measured by a pilot study on 25 PACS users; Cronbach’s Alpha was estimated 0.78. Data were analyzed using SPSS 18. Also, frequency, mean, standard deviation were used.Results: The results are presented in three sections: environment (Background Variables), benefits and challenges of PACS. As to the system availability, 20.8% of the users in the clinic, 75.5% in the diagnostic imaging department, only 3.8% in offices had access to the PACS. As to system accessibility, 49.1% of the users just had access to tests, 5.7% only to the reports, and 45.3% to both reports and tests. With respect to benefits of PACS, the mean was 4.16 (SD: 0.5) (five-point scale 1-5) estimated, and in challenges, the mean was 3.48(SD: 0.5) (five-point scale 1-5).Conclusion: The results showed that although PACS could eliminate many restrictions concerning the use of radiology images and films, there were challenges in this regard. Users are recommended to have access to PACS in all clinics, physicians’ offices, and diagnostic imaging department. The majority of users agreed with the PACS benefits. Adequate management measures must be taken to maximize the benefits derived from this system and the utilization of information in order to improve the quality of care. Adequate training and elimination of the deficiencies could affect the use of this system and improvement in the health care services.Keywords: PACS, Picture Archiving and Communication System, Assessment, Infoway
  1. Safdari R, Dargahi H, Eshraghian M, al. e. [Human factors affecting the application of information technology by TUMS middle managers]. PayavardeSalamat 2011, The Journal of Allied Medical Sciences School, Medical Sciences/Tehran University. 2011;5(1):24-31.
  2. Mooghali A, Talebi S, Seif MH. Contributing factors to the attitudes toward using informationand communication technology (ICT) among students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, School of Management. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2011;8(1):33-40.
  3. Rezaeihachesoo P, Fozoonkhah S, Safaei N, Lotfnejad Afshar H. [Organizational and Health Care Process Management with Use of Information Technology]. Health Information Management. 2010;7(3):352.
  4. HayaviHaghighi M, Alipour J, Mastaneh Z, Mouseli L. [Feasibility study of telemedicine implementation in Hormozgan University of medical sciences]. HMJ. 2011;15(2):128-37.
  5. Shekhi M, Jodeiri F. [Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of Digital Radiography and Temporal Digital Subtraction Radiography in Detection of Dentinal Caries Progression]. JSSU. 2011;19(1):54-64.
  6. Jabbari N, Lotfnezhad Afshar H, Zeinali A. [Problems and obstacles in implementation of Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) in Urmia Imam Khomeini Hospital]. Journal of Hospital. 2011;10(4):52.
  7. JABBARI N, LOTFNEZHAD AH, ZEINALI A, FEIZI A, SHENO AKJ. Problems and obstacles in implementation of Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) in Urmia Imam Khomeini Hospital. 2012.
  8. Dreyer KJ, Thrall JH, Hirschorn DS, Mehta A. 2006.
  9. Tsai T-S, Fang R-J, Huang T-H, Su S-M, Hall K-F, editors. The impact of PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System) for M-learning on the medical affairs. Proceedings of the 6th Conference on WSEAS InternationalConference on Applied Computer Science-Volume. World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS); 2007.
  10. Van Heerden J, Lockhat Z, Bam D, Fletcher L, Sommerville J. PACS: Do clinical users benefit from it as a training adjunct? SA Journal of Radiology. 2011;15(2):38-41.
  11. Mansoori B, Erhard KK, Sunshine JL. Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) implementation, integration & benefits in an integrated health system. Acad Radiol. 2012;19(2):229-35.
  12. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, Pomerantz S, Dahlke A, Rallis D. Radiologists’ Productivity in the Interpretation of CT Scans. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2001;176(4):861-4.
  13. Cox B, Dawe N. Evaluation of the impact of a PACS system on an intensive care unit. J Manag Med. 2002;16(2-3):199-205.
  14. Bowers GH, Steiner E, Kalman M. Implementing teleradiology in a private radiology practice: lessons learned. J Digit Imaging. 1998;11(3 Suppl 1):96-8.
  15. Brink J. PACS Innovations leading to improved patient care. Applied Radiology. 1998;27(8):29-30.
  16. Tan SL, Lewis RA. Picture archiving and communication systems: a multicentre survey of users experience and satisfaction. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75(3):406-10.
  17. MacDonald D, Neville D. Evaluating the implementation of picture archiving and communication systems in Newfoundland and Labrador--a cost benefit analysis. J Digit Imaging. 2010;23(6):721-31.
  18. Paskins Z, Rai A. The impact of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) implementation in rheumatology. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006;45(3):354-5.
  19. Kang BJ, Kim SH, Choi BG. Comparison of full-field digital mammography workstation and conventional picture archiving and communication system in image quality and diagnostic performance. Clin Imaging. 2011;35(5):336-40.
  20. Splawinski J, Fox R, Hall H, Fisher CG, Dvorak M. Imaging for spinal surgery. Can J Surg. 2006;49(5):311-2; discussion 3.
  21. GHOLAM HL, Sadeghi M. Assessment of hospital information system efficiency (SHAFA) in Imam Reza hospital. 2012.
Health Management & Information Science
Volume 4, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
28
Autumn 2017
Pages 120-124